Slate Mailers On The Way
I think I've seen the type of slate mailers the Eureka Reporter refers to in today's issue. I haven't seen the one being sent out now but I believe I've gotten them in the past. They're almost shameless but, as I recall, they do everything to make you think they're sent by one political party except for actually saying it, so you can't really say they're lying.
Clever, and maybe I'll take that last statement back: They are shameless. What I'd like to know is who paid for this latest one? Local Solutions?
posted by Fred Mangels @ 7:51 AM
8 comments
8 Comments:
I've seen this before in SF, and if any of the local progressives have anything to do with this, shame on them.
Usually what they do is list all of the organization's endorsements with one candidate different. Probably works well for that candidate.
I'd like to know why the Republicans said that it was about Measure T. When you read the story, the paper makes clear that T isn't mentioned in any of the slate mailers. Why would Benzel lie about that?
It is obvious that Benzel (or more likely the editor's at Arkley's paper) distorted the truth regarding Measure T and the slate mailer.
It is laughable to watch the Arkley Distorter pretend to be a newspaper even as they do backflips to serve their real Master.
Whatever, 3:08. Whatever.
The slate mailers list the candidates who PAY to get thier name on there... The fake Republican voting guide lists gallegos. That cost our stellar Da about $1200. NO wonder he's out of money and begging for cash.
Those mailers are lies, intentionally deceptive, and offensive.
I generally figure whoever buys into that doesn't get my vote.
I am with you on this 10:43. They are lies and deceptive and if you buy a space on them you have NO credibility with me.
I am with you on this 10:43. They are lies and deceptive and if you buy a space on them you have NO credibility with me.
Super color scheme, I like it! Good job. Go on.
»
Post a Comment
<< Home