Make $$$ On The Web?
I'd almost forgotten about all those Make Money On The Web deals that were all over the internet years ago. So, it piqued my curiousity when my internet buddy, Tom Knapp, over that The Knappster blog, mentioned a site where you could get paid for blogging.
He says he's already gotten a couple five dollar commissions from referrals, or some such, from PayPerPost. He seems to think this is the real thing.
I've tried a number of money- on- the- web schemes over the years. First deal I got involved in was All Advantage, which would pay you for running a special tool(?) bar in your browser as you surfed the web. Then I got involved with at least two or three other similar deals, the names of which escape me now.
I actually made maybe $100.00 all told with All Advantage in the course of a year or two. I'd wait until I'd accumulated $25.00 (their minimum for writing a check) and then ask for a check.
All of those deals seemed to get less and less worthwhile as the cash rewards were reduced to almost non- existent. When I finally quit All Advantage, along with the rest, all they offered you was so many entries in a drawing for some cash award. It wasn't worth it anymore so I finally said good riddance to All Advantage and the rest of those outfits.
There were also deals, and they still exist, where you'd bet paid for hits on web sites. One such deal was Terrashare. They were basically a server and would give you web space to put up whatever web sites you wanted, although you were stuck with displaying their banner ads. Terrashare finally threw in the towel around the time I'd accumulated a hard earned three or four bucks over maybe a year and a half.
Then there's the widely known and used affiliate site thing where you could earn commissions on things bought by clinking on links you had on your web pages. Amazon.com does it as do a whole bunch of other retail sites. I signed up with a bunch of those and never got a penny in sales.
Last, but certainly not the least, was Greenfield Online. That was one of those things where you get paid to take surveys. Sometimes they'd pay you a dollar to just take the survey. Sometimes you'd get a special invite and just those few invited would get maybe ten dollars per survey and sometimes they'd have these special focus groups where they'd pay you anywhere from $25 to $50 to take part, assuming you qualified.
They also offered random drawings of from five to ten dollars of which I won quite a few. I actually made out quite well with Greenfield. But, like all the rest, cash awards got fewer and fewer and, as they went more for entries into drawings as rewards, as All Advantage did, it just got to the point it wasn't worth the hassle, so Greenfield went by the wayside, just like all the rest.
I'll have to check out that PayPerPost deal. I could always use an extra few bucks. Then again, I probably spend too much time with this blog as it is. If any of you should decide to take a shot at it, let me know how it goes and maybe I'll give it a half- hearted try.
26 Comments:
If your blog is big enough for an advertiser to pay you to write a permanently archived commercial for them, your blog is big enough for the advertiser to simply buy a temporary ad. Don't sell your credibility. If your voice is for sale, why should we trust you?
Look into self-selling sites such as Blogads.com. A potential advertiser clicks a link on your blog and configures an ad. You approve or decline the ad and Blogads.com takes a cut of the sale. You might attact some local advertisers. If your weekly page views are at least 3,000, you might attract an occassional national advertiser (assuming your self-set rates are low enough). [If you're seriously interested, wait until Wednesday because Blogads is launching a new version of their system next week.]
Thanks for the heads up. I don't know that I'd want to mix this blog up with some commercial venture, although I don't know that I would have a problem with a few advertisements in the side bar.
I'd probably start another blog if I wanted to do a money making thing.
it wouldn't bother me if you had ads, Fred.
You could be the first local blog to carry a Eureka Reporter ad.
Jeez Fred, you put out such voluminous verbal drivel on this blog and others, where do find the time to hack weeds? Or are you retired?
10:40, if youd on't like it here, leave.
It's called envy.
Correct, anybody who is anybody reads Fred's blog.
10:40 begone.
all the papers would do well to place ads with you Fred.
10:40, if youd on't like it here, leave.
Gosh 11:01, 10:40's question seems legitimate enough to me!
Where DO you find the time to hack weeds, Fred? Are you retired?
10:40 asks, "Or are you retired?".
No, I'm not retired and probably never will be able to retire.
Anonymous wrote:
"If your blog is big enough for an advertiser to pay you to write a permanently archived commercial for them, your blog is big enough for the advertiser to simply buy a temporary ad. Don't sell your credibility. If your voice is for sale, why should we trust you?"
I'd agree if the blogger hid the fact that the posts in question were sponsored, or was willing to say things he didn't mean for the money.
On my own blog, however, my posts are clearly labeled "sponsored post" and my readers know that I won't say anything I won't stand behind. Some of the PayPerPost opportunities specify that you can't reveal sponsorship -- I don't accept those offers. Others require a particular viewpoint. If I can't deliver that viewpoint in good conscience, I don't accept the offer. I pick offers that involve topics I'm interested in to some degree, and that allow me to say what I think.
I agree with you, though, that Blogads is great as well. It's just a different kind of service than PayPerPost.
Wow, Fred, I'd forgotten all about AllAdvantage. I got a few checks from them before they went squirrelly, too. I still do surveys, but with LightSpeed rather than Greenfield. The return isn't huge but it's reliable and I like doing surveys anyway (I usually cash in my "Lightspeed Points" for Amazon.Com gift certificates).
Regards,
Tom Knapp
"No, I'm not retired and probably never will be able to retire."
That's sad, Fred! You're going to have to hack weeds 'til you drop dead??
Dang, doesn't that seem a little outrageous to you? Don't you think there's something very wrong with this society and its economic system that this should be your fate?
And here you've been so loyal to the Arkleys. Shouldn't they kick in with a little spare change when you finally fall to your knees on the grass, clutching your chest as your trusty weed-eater sputters and gouges the sod? It would be so easy for them. They're billionaires fer cryin' out loud. And yet it would mean so much to you, their ever-loyal ally.
God help us, Fred, who is this idiot? What a jerk!
"That's sad, Fred! You're going to have to hack weeds 'til you drop dead??".
Yep, sad indeed, but why should I point fingers at the Arkleys for my own problems? They've given more money just to Miranda Animal Rescue than you've given to any worthy cause in your entire life- all fourteen years of it.
And last I heard, they aren't quite yet billionaires. Of course, it's been a few months since I was told that. Maybe Rob's made his first billion now. Let's hope so and, if he has, give him a round of applause.
why should I point fingers at the Arkleys for my own problems?
Nobody said anything about "pointing fingers at the Arkleys for your own problems". Rub your eyes and read it again, Fred.
1:46 simply said, quite rightly, that the Arkleys ought to reward you for your loyalty, in your time of need. It would be only fair. It's not charity. It's legitimate payment, for a job well done.
This posts was paid for by Lipton Ice Tea®
What did you mix with your tea, Anon.R.mous? A little booze?
"It's called envy."
"Correct, anybody who is anybody reads Fred's blog.
10:40 begone."
Omigawd! Do you realize what you're saying? You're banishing 10:40 to the ignominious netherworld of nobodies who never read Fred's blog!
How cruel!
But wait! Fred has not banished 10:40! Look! He even answered 10:40's question!
Hooray! Three cheers for Fred! What knight in shining armour! Fred is allowing 10:40 to stay and read the most important blog in Humboldt County! Now you're anybody who is anybody, 10:40!
Welcome to the Elite!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
3:36, thanks for the spam.
10:40, 12:05 and 1:46 have to be the same moron Fred.
He's jealous because your so reasonable and he's such an arkley hater he consumed by it.
Reminds me of R. Trent.
2:45 wrote, "1:46 simply said, quite rightly, that the Arkleys ought to reward you for your loyalty, in your time of need. It would be only fair.".
Bullshit! You two are waay out there. The Arkley's business is the Arkley's business. My business is mine.
This insane focus so many on the Left have with the Arkleys, is just that: Insane. I think we've seen that since just about every subject on this blog, ends up with some mention of the Arkleys.
Sorry. I'll break with protocol here and say:
You guys and girls are sick. I'm not referring to the lefties that have some valid issues to raise- just the ones that are obsessed with the Arkleys, who have done more for the community than any of you could hope to do.
The Arkleys owe me nothing. I've made my own way in life. I've made my own mistakes. It's best for people like me that people like the Arkleys make a bunch of money. That way, they can give money to more people in need.
Something most of the Arkley bashers can't even come close to doing the same, with their limited, if any, wealth. And that's assuming they do anything at all, other than trying to make someone who makes more money than them, pay for their pet projects.
So there. I sure told you.
Fred, Looks like the leftist whackaloons and the asshat troll are using more and more of your bandwidth. You might consider the other options in comments.
Yes 3:10 (10:40, 12:05 and 1:46) I vote for banishing you to the ignominious netherworld of nobodies who never read Fred's blog!
Leonidas wrote, "You might consider the other options in comments.".
I suppose I could moderate comments. Then again, that would be a hassle.
I see Carol and Greg Conners started up a blog http://beinghumboldt.blogspot.com/ (back in June?). Humboldt Nation doesn't allow anonymous comments. Of course, they don't seem to get many comments, either.
I don't know what I'll do. I'll admit I find some of the lame comments quite annoying. But, as I've said before, they kind of speak for themselves and don't really need to be replied to. Sometimes I just can't help myself, though, especially after beer o'clock.
Post a Comment
<< Home