Republicans For Clinton???
Over at antiwar.com, Lucy Steigerwald wonders why more Republicans aren't supporting Hillary Clinton.
She makes a point, but what about Gary Johnson?
"Ever since the more mainstream Republican right began to turn on Donald Trump, I’ve wondered why they don’t simply bite the bullet and vote for Hillary Clinton instead."
posted by Fred Mangels @ 8:44 AM
7 comments
7 Comments:
that mainstream republicans have bailed on Trump is reverse psychology media hype. A favorite dirty trick of the Hillary voters. Beware of anyone who answers a question with another question. A diversion from the truth based on political propoganda and rumour.
It would probably be better for the Democrats if they, disillusioned Republicans, just stayed home on election day.
That way down-ticket voting could not only swing the Senate but quite possibly the House too. Finally would have a Congress that does something besides "investigate" HRC over and over and over ad nauseum, instead of doing their jobs.
Yeah, Fred, and that would include raising taxes! Mostly on Corporations and 1%ers, like....Trump! Contrary to what he says the US is not the most tax burdened country on earth. Not even close. But we do have the biggest and loudest crybabies about it. Big reason he won't release tax returns... he pays a lower rate than middle class, ya think? That was certainly true of Romney.
Anon 9:06
HaHaHaHa! That's funny. Everybody luvs them some Trump, huh? Isn't it a bit early in the AM for hitting the sauce?
Here's a snapshot for you: In a swing state like Florida Clinton Democrats have 33 field offices working the phones and voter registration. Trump Republican field office in Fl. - 1! Oh, yeah, the election is "rigged". What else could explain it?
If you really care about our country and have taken a close look at Donald Trump then you realize that Trump is the worst potential president we've had on the ticket ever.
Romney, McCain, Dole? All decent people.
Trump? A piece of human trash.
Voting for Johnson isn't a bad idea. If you live in a state where Clinton is far ahead. It might show the Republican party the direction you would like it to go.
If you live in a state where the race is anything other than totally safe for Clinton then take no chance on putting a dangerous person in the highest office in the land.
I agree with PAF.
Johnson is no better. What he himself doesn't grab for government to control, he gives to the UN or TPP. He's a Jill Stein shill.
If we want liberty, limited & defined government like the Framer's outlined, Darrell Castle is the only worthwhile candidate. He's a Ron Paul, James Madison, Jefferson mix.
Then vote for Castle if you'd like.
Post a Comment
<< Home