Tuesday, January 10, 2017

State Replaces Parents In California

Many parents are rightfully concerned about a bill introduced recently in the California legislature. SB18 by Doctor Richard Pan requires "all children have "“parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest” and to “form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being." Does that really need to be said? That might not sound too ominous to Democrats who have total faith in The State, but it's a real concern when that State wants to let itself decide which basic parental decisions are right and good for the child. Never mind we already have laws of that regard to a great extent.

Other parts of the bill seem of even more concern:

It also stipulates that the child is to “live in a safe and healthy environment

We can just imagine what will be deemed a safe environment by The State. After all, we know progressives think eating red meat is unhealthy and contributes to global warming. Will children be taken from homes where red meat is eaten since it's deemed unhealthy? What about homes when parents smoke tobacco or pot? Will kids be removed?

It's frightening to think about the slippery slope this law leads to. Perhaps even more frightening that the Democrats think they can easily introduce such a bill and no one will resist. 

Seem far fetched? I don't think so. It's not unlike every other stupid law Democrats make into law. They pass it, figuring they'll deal with the fallout later. Bad law introduced by bad people. No question about it.

9 Comments:

At 8:24 AM, Blogger gabriele gray said...

I'd like to see reliable research on the basis for all this cloud cuckoo land "for the children" malarkey.

 
At 8:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The benefits of the nanny state. The nanny is spreading her wings, exercising her authority. Tis for the common good, don't cha know.

 
At 9:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Herding independent children into the slaughter house, for the protection of collective zombified children.

 
At 10:18 AM, Blogger Rick Wentworth said...

just look at kalifornia adoption laws for what they consider safe environment . its lots different than most other states or countries and the most restrictive .

 
At 10:26 AM, Blogger Fred Mangels said...

Yep. I suspect we have more than enough child protection laws in California. This seems more an effort to expand the power of the State than anything else to me.

 
At 10:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone once said that the difference between a Pit Bull and Child Protective Services is that with a Pit Bull at least you get half your child back.

 
At 11:45 AM, Blogger Fred Mangels said...

I've heard nothing but horror stories about Child Protective Services. I feat this new law will make them worse as it likely will give them more power.

 
At 7:44 PM, Blogger Henchman Of Justice said...

The state of California is just trying to get a heads up and get their foot in the door front of the line for the new voters of the future.

 
At 10:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The mkultra and/or paid provacteurs campaigns have been distributing on social media. Videos by parents encouraging older kids to attack 2yr olds. They are hoping to manipulate the patriots into demanding for schools & states to take over parental rights.
It's as transparent as can be. Let's hope the decent people who fight for individual accountability hold themselves accountable & on course.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home